<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fallacy of the excluded middle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zeigen.com/blog/2009/07/excluded-middle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zeigen.com/blog/2009/07/excluded-middle/</link>
	<description>The Mack Family experience.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.zeigen.com/blog/2009/07/excluded-middle/comment-page-1/#comment-169401</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeigen.com/blog/?p=1331#comment-169401</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I follow how my example is a counter-example. The fallacy of the excluded middle says that you can&#039;t just look at either extreme (no water, too much water) but you have to look at the middle as well. I&#039;m saying that the same thing applies many other places as well -- that nothing is either good/bad or black/white but usually somewhere in the middle (mostly good, mostly bad, a mixed bag).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I follow how my example is a counter-example. The fallacy of the excluded middle says that you can&#8217;t just look at either extreme (no water, too much water) but you have to look at the middle as well. I&#8217;m saying that the same thing applies many other places as well &#8212; that nothing is either good/bad or black/white but usually somewhere in the middle (mostly good, mostly bad, a mixed bag).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://www.zeigen.com/blog/2009/07/excluded-middle/comment-page-1/#comment-169239</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zeigen.com/blog/?p=1331#comment-169239</guid>
		<description>No to be picky Stephen, but I think your first example is a counter example of what you&#039;re railing against.  

Too much water you drown,  then the middle where one is hydrated and happy, and then of course the death due to not having enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No to be picky Stephen, but I think your first example is a counter example of what you&#8217;re railing against.  </p>
<p>Too much water you drown,  then the middle where one is hydrated and happy, and then of course the death due to not having enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
